Texas Jurisprudence Exam Physician Assistant Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the Texas Jurisprudence Exam for Physician Assistants with comprehensive questions and detailed explanations. Study using multiple choice and flashcards to boost your confidence for the exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


Which individual is NOT permitted to consent to medical treatment of a child when the person with legal consent cannot be contacted?

  1. A parent of the child

  2. A 16-year-old sibling

  3. An adult grandparent

  4. A stepparent of the child

The correct answer is: A 16-year-old sibling

In the context of medical treatment consent for a minor, it's important to understand the legal framework surrounding who can provide consent when a parent or legal guardian is unavailable. Generally, parents have the primary authority to consent to medical treatment for their children. In situations where a parent cannot be reached, certain relatives and adults in the child's life may be authorized to provide consent under specific conditions. A 16-year-old sibling typically does not possess the legal authority to consent to medical treatment for a younger sibling. Although they may be responsible and capable of assisting with some matters, legal consent for medical procedures or treatment is generally reserved for adults who can assume responsibility for the implications of such consent. This is why a sibling, even if they are a minor themselves, is not permitted to act in this role. On the other hand, a parent can consent at any time, an adult grandparent is recognized as a potential decision-maker in the absence of a parent, and a stepparent often has the ability to consent to treatment if they are legally recognized as a caregiver or if they are considered to have a significant role in the child’s life. Thus, it becomes clear that the option of a 16-year-old sibling is not legally viable for providing consent, making